≡ Menu

How Google’s Chrome OS has deep roots in Eric Schimdt’s past | VentureBeat

“In the article, Schmidt, who has a doctorate in electrical engineering and computer science, predicted that Wintel — the duopoly of Microsoft Windows and Intel’s microprocessors — would be “hollowed out” by the Internet. That is, plentiful broadband connectivity would mean that you wouldn’t really need a client-heavy operating system and the heavy-duty chips to run it. You could get by with a thin client. That client would connect to servers in an Internet-connected data center, where the heavy computing would take place.”

I seemed to spend half the late-1990’s writing about network computers, McNealy, Schmidt and Ellison. They never got the fundamental point: people want to do more than a dumb terminal can do. A powerful computer will always be able to do more fun things than a thin client, and powerful computers keep getting cheaper to the point where they are as cheap as thin clients.

Netbooks are a case in point. This year’s netbook isn’t particularly powerful. Next years will be as powerful as last year’s consumer PC. The following year, they will be as powerful as my MacBook Pro.

Moores’ Law makes “thin clients” into thick ones.

Posted via web from Ian Betteridge’s lifestream

Comments on this entry are closed.

  • adam_hartung

    That Google would go after this new business surprises only those that don't understand Google. Industrial-era thinkers believe you should “stick to your focus”. Like GM. But Google knows that in an information economy if you don't keep moving into new markets with new technologies looking for more revenues you won't survive. Read more at http://www.ThePhoenixPrinciple.com