<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Repeat after me: browsing share is not market share</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technovia.co.uk/2009/01/repeat-after-me-browsing-share-is-not-market-share.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technovia.co.uk/2009/01/repeat-after-me-browsing-share-is-not-market-share.html</link>
	<description>Ian Betteridge on Macs, mobiles, and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:45:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikinerd</title>
		<link>http://www.technovia.co.uk/2009/01/repeat-after-me-browsing-share-is-not-market-share.html/comment-page-1#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikinerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianbetteridge.co.uk/technovia/2009/01/repeat-after-me-browsing-share-is-not-market-share.html#comment-138</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;... though I remember reading somewhere that Net Applications use &quot;unique users&quot; instead of mere usage...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; though I remember reading somewhere that Net Applications use &#8220;unique users&#8221; instead of mere usage&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Betteridge</title>
		<link>http://www.technovia.co.uk/2009/01/repeat-after-me-browsing-share-is-not-market-share.html/comment-page-1#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Betteridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianbetteridge.co.uk/technovia/2009/01/repeat-after-me-browsing-share-is-not-market-share.html#comment-139</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Also, of course - it&#039;s a quiet week for news, at least until tomorrow... ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, of course &#8211; it&#8217;s a quiet week for news, at least until tomorrow&#8230; <img src='http://www.technovia.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.technovia.co.uk/2009/01/repeat-after-me-browsing-share-is-not-market-share.html/comment-page-1#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianbetteridge.co.uk/technovia/2009/01/repeat-after-me-browsing-share-is-not-market-share.html#comment-140</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is one of those cases where you can justify claiming media bias. It involves the beloved underdog (Apple) posting a victory over the evil overlord (Microsoft). NetApplcations knows how to play the game (which is why they&#039;re as clear as mud when explaining what they actually measure). I think reporters know enough that usage share is a less &quot;stable&quot; metric, and if NetApps were more explicit in saying they measured that, you&#039;d see far fewer articles starting with &quot;NetApplications reports...&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is one of those cases where you can justify claiming media bias. It involves the beloved underdog (Apple) posting a victory over the evil overlord (Microsoft). NetApplcations knows how to play the game (which is why they&#8217;re as clear as mud when explaining what they actually measure). I think reporters know enough that usage share is a less &#8220;stable&#8221; metric, and if NetApps were more explicit in saying they measured that, you&#8217;d see far fewer articles starting with &#8220;NetApplications reports&#8230;&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Aughton</title>
		<link>http://www.technovia.co.uk/2009/01/repeat-after-me-browsing-share-is-not-market-share.html/comment-page-1#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Aughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianbetteridge.co.uk/technovia/2009/01/repeat-after-me-browsing-share-is-not-market-share.html#comment-141</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I’m glad I’m not the only one to despair at the use of “market share” in this context. As you say, it’s plain dumb.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m glad I’m not the only one to despair at the use of “market share” in this context. As you say, it’s plain dumb.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

